Congress May Finally Offer Support for the Energy Sector in Summer Stimulus Legislation

Congress has spent more than three trillion dollars so far in its efforts to stimulate the economy. Curiously, none of that money has been directed toward the nation’s energy sector—other than some independent operations that may have qualified as small businesses. It is strange because the government has, in past downturns, recognized the role of energy in accelerating growth, from the New Deal-era Rural Electrification Administration to a $90 billion investment in renewables in President Obama’s stimulus package in 2009.

Moreover, clean energy industries have demonstrated such outstanding growth potential the past decade but have been devastated by the pandemic. A recent report from the analysis of U.S. Department of Labor data found that 620,590 workers in clean energy occupations, representing 18.5 percent of the industry’s workforce, filed for unemployment benefits in March, April, and May. The number of jobs lost is more than double the number of clean energy jobs created since 2017, but many of them could quickly recover.

What is frustrating is that an ideal bill had been queued up even before the pandemic that had enjoyed strong bipartisan support. The American Energy Innovation Act (AEIA), a legislative package comprised of over 50 bills reported to the Senate in 2019, was introduced in February by Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chair Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Ranking Member Joe Manchin (D-WV). But it was derailed by disagreements after a bill was added that would have reduced hydrofluorocarbon use.

That bill may be back and could be the heart of the next stimulus package. During a webinar hosted this week by Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions, Lucy Murfitt, chief counsel for the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, assured participants that Chairman Murkowski will make a major push to pass the AEIA in July.

"I want to make sure that you understand, because I think if Senator Murkowski were on this call right now, she'd be telling you this—she is absolutely 110% committed to this bill," Murfitt said. "She has not wavered at all on that. And she's gonna fight until there's just simply no path forward left for the bill."

Another existing bill that could be a practical option to help stimulate the nation’s energy sector is America’s Transportation Infrastructure Act (ATIA), which would help streamline federal approval of clean-energy infrastructure projects, helping us lower carbon emissions, increase our carbon-capture capabilities, and fund sustainable energy projects.

In recent days, Democrats have offered partisan bills that would seem to have less opportunity for passage because of their plainly political goals.

The House of Representatives is planning to bring the Democrats’ GREEN Act to the floor this week as part of a larger $1.5 trillion green stimulus dubbed the Moving Forward Act, which is over 2,300 pages and includes federal tax incentives for solar, storage, offshore wind, electric vehicles, among others.

Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that the Democrats’ new climate agenda is “tying [the] environment to racial justice.” It features ambitious goals, such as ensuring that every new car sold by 2035 emits no greenhouse gases and eliminating overall emissions from the power sector. But it also explicitly cites the police killing of George Floyd in its opening paragraph and goes on to argue that communities of color are at greater risk from the effects of climate change. 

From a pure consumer perspective, social justice benefits are dubious and will only weaken tangible choices. Boosting innovation and emerging energy industries is good, but only if the solutions are practical and actionable. Considering the Green New Deal already fell flat on its face when it was wheeled out a few years ago, these latest efforts by the Democrats seem once again far too politicized to gain support in the Senate. Cynics might suggest they want to keep the issue alive for the election rather than get behind something that can actually pass, like the AEIA. 

Regardless, there does seem to be real hope for some sort of action in the next round of stimulus packages. The Energy Choice Coalition will follow developments carefully and stand up for consumers.

Report: Wind and solar increasingly competitive with fossil

Renewable power projects are increasingly priced competitively compared with fossil-fueled energy projects, according to a report from the International Renewable Energy Agency.

According to E&E ClimateWire, the Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates-based IRENA found that electricity from wind or solar energy technology is “proving cheaper than continuing to operate coal-fired power facilities.” The conclusions come from assessing 2019 global energy market conditions.

The new study "confirms how decisively the tables have turned," wrote IRENA researchers.

Federal Land Rent Hike Reveals the Need for Streamlined Renewables Permitting

The pandemic has been exceptionally difficult for U.S. clean energy. Nearly 600,000 clean energy workers have lost their jobs since March, and now the industry has a new problem—rent is due.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has responsibly approved more than 11,000 megawatts of clean energy projects on federal land. And in 2018, the U.S. Department of the Interior decided to stop charging rent on these projects in response to company complaints that the previous administration had raised the rent too high compared to rent on private property.

Renewables top coal in power generation for first time

Americans used more energy from renewable sources last year than from coal for the first time since 1885 - when coal replaced wood as the dominant fuel source, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) Monthly Energy Review.

Coal accounted for 11.3 quadrillion British thermal units of energy in 2019, a 15% decline from the prior year, and total renewable energy consumption grew by 1%. This outcome mainly reflects the continued decline in the amount of coal used for electricity generation over the past decade as well as growth in renewable energy, mostly from wind and solar.

IRS Extends Renewables Tax Credit Deadline By A Year

The Internal Revenue Service on Wednesday issued guidance extending the placed-in-service deadline for both the production tax credit for renewable energy facilities under section 45 of the Internal Revenue Code and the investment tax credit for energy property under section 48.

The new guidance gives wind and solar developers an extra year to meet so-called safe harbor requirements to qualify for the tax credits. The Treasury Department decision applies to projects that get under

The IRS notice is here.

“Treasury’s decision is welcome news for the renewable energy sector, which has been struggling with the government-mandated shutdowns along with the rest of the country,” said Robert Dillon, executive director of the Energy Choice Coalition. “This provides sorely needed flexibility for an industry that has lost an estimated 600,000 jobs in the past three months.”

The notice extends the safe harbor requirement from four to five years for projects that started construction in 2016 or 2017, which is beneficial for projects that have been delayed by supply chain or financing delays.

New Jobs Reports Detail Pandemic’s Grim Impact on U.S. Renewables

The far-reaching implications of a global pandemic has disrupted every facet of the economy. Local markets across the nation are reeling in response to an economic downturn previously unheard of in scope and size.

Clean energy—a fast-growing industry only months ago and a significant job creator for more than a decade—is now dealing with rampant job loss, as new development activities and investments have been stifled in the wake of COVID-19.

Energy Choice Coalition Signs Letter to Energy & Commerce and Energy & Natural Resources Committees on Competitive Electricity Markets

Energy Choice Coalition Signs Letter to Energy & Commerce and Energy & Natural Resources Committees on Competitive Electricity Markets

The country is experiencing a public health and economic emergency, the full impact of which will not be fully understood for some time. Given the foundational role that electricity plays in unlocking virtually all economic activity in the United States, it is vital that Congress take full advantage of any opportunity to lower consumer electricity costs and expand jobs and economic activity in the electricity sector.

COVID-19 Relief Measures for Renewables

We recently shared analyses by Wood Mackenzie and various industry associations about the pandemic’s impact on our nation’s transition to clean energy. In short, all energy sectors, including renewables, have been hit hard and will need significant time to recover. However, they all saw plenty of opportunities in the post-COVID marketplace.

The question for lawmakers is how to hasten recovery with specific policy solutions. Certainly, a number of measures could be added to upcoming stimulus packages, or they could be passed à la carte. Many small businesses operate in these sectors and have received some support from the third stimulus package, and Congress should double down on economy-wide solutions that help them.

Wood Mackenzie, Industry Associations Report Coronavirus Impact on Energy Transition

Wood Mackenzie, Industry Associations Report Coronavirus Impact on Energy Transition

With over half of the world’s population and most of the United States under lockdown because of the COVID-19 pandemic, energy demand has dropped to levels not seen in decades. It has all happened so quickly that reliable analyses of the impact on the energy sector have been changing rapidly. Even now, no one knows what will unfold the next few weeks let alone months or years. But early estimates are coming in, and they are troubling.

One of the most trusted authorities on the energy sector is Wood Mackenzie. This consultancy firm that began in the 1970s by developing expertise in upstream oil and gas has broadened its focus to deliver the same level of detailed insight for every interconnected sector of the energy, chemicals, metals, and mining industries it now serves around the world.

Virginia Ratepayers Should Keep an Eye on the State Senate

Virginia’s monopoly utility, Dominion Energy, lost a major battle Wednesday when the Virginia Senate approved a bill restoring state regulators' oversight of how electric utilities can write off certain costs. Dominion has strongly opposed the vote and was able to convince the Senate to reconsider, putting off a final decision.

The bill’s fate is still uncertain as it remains one of the most contentious topics between the Senate and the House as this year's legislative comes to a close on Saturday.

South Carolina Legislature Commits to Study Retail Electricity Choice

South Carolina is currently not among the handful of states that allow residents to choose their energy supplier, but that could soon change. The state legislature is weighing a proposal to create a study committee to look at the benefits of residential energy choice. The past year has seen a wave of momentum among states looking to adopt retail energy choice. The center point of this movement has been in the South, where states like Virginia, Florida, and the Carolinas have pushed grassroots efforts to increase competition in their power markets.

Energy Choice in Arizona: Current Status and Next Steps

The battle to grant American consumers a choice in their energy provider is a state-by-state fight, and one that has seen over a dozen individual states find success. In contrast, a handful of other states are ground zero for this push to continue reaching new communities.

Arizona is one of those states ripe for progress, and in fact, has among the brightest spotlight being shined on it by both energy choice advocates and the opponents who want to see utilities retain their monopolies.

In Middletown, Pennsylvania, the Battle for Energy Choice Gets Hyperlocal

In Middletown, Pennsylvania, the Battle for Energy Choice Gets Hyperlocal

As those who fight for the freedom of energy choice know, the ability to choose a power supplier opens doors for individual customers. A single household or commercial entity can evaluate which energy suppliers align most with their needs, whether through lower prices, increased flexibility and personalization in rate structure, a greater presence of renewable energy, or otherwise. The mere presence of open competition on the energy market, meanwhile, shifts the motivations of power providers. The utilities will see they can no longer automatically default to monopolies, but rather they must earn the business of customers, like every other industry across the country.

In Northeastern States, Energy Choice Under Attack as Electricity Retailers Get Restricted

In Northeastern States, Energy Choice Under Attack as Electricity Retailers Get Restricted

Much of the attention in the realm of energy choice recently has been in the southern United States, with the Energy Freedom Act in the Carolinas, the Florida Supreme Court striking down the energy choice ballot initiative, and the Virginia Energy Reform Act. But as 2020 comes into full swing it has become clear that the Northeast is an integral battleground.

In the past, northeastern states have been great examples of the benefits of energy choice and the successful implementation of such programs. But those who want to restrict energy choice are fighting in these states to take away the freedom of energy choice.